<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?><rss version="2.0"
	xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/"
	xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/"
	xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom"
	xmlns:sy="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/syndication/"
		>
<channel>
	<title>Comments on: DISPATCHES: THE TROUBLE WITH BRITISH AIRWAYS</title>
	<atom:link href="http://primetime.unrealitytv.co.uk/dispatches-the-trouble-with-british-airways/feed/" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml" />
	<link>http://primetime.unrealitytv.co.uk/dispatches-the-trouble-with-british-airways/</link>
	<description>All The Latest TV Gossip, News, Episode Updates and Spoilers From Your Favourite Soaps, Sitcoms and Primetime Shows.</description>
	<lastBuildDate>Sun, 22 Nov 2009 22:37:53 +0000</lastBuildDate>
	<generator>http://wordpress.org/?v=2.8.5</generator>
	<sy:updatePeriod>hourly</sy:updatePeriod>
	<sy:updateFrequency>1</sy:updateFrequency>
		<item>
		<title>By: paul</title>
		<link>http://primetime.unrealitytv.co.uk/dispatches-the-trouble-with-british-airways/comment-page-1/#comment-5840</link>
		<dc:creator>paul</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Tue, 14 Oct 2008 22:48:33 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://primetime.unrealitytv.co.uk/?p=5523#comment-5840</guid>
		<description>What a load of old tosh.  Out of date examples, sketchy details, and only part of each story.  Why do we insist on attacking British companies like this.  This programme amounted to nothing more than a one-sided attack.  I feel we didnt get the whole picture or story from each of the examples used.  The example of the 2003 saftey issues was merely tacked onto the end of the programme- if this had any substance wouldn&#039;t it have been mentioned before in the programme?</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>What a load of old tosh.  Out of date examples, sketchy details, and only part of each story.  Why do we insist on attacking British companies like this.  This programme amounted to nothing more than a one-sided attack.  I feel we didnt get the whole picture or story from each of the examples used.  The example of the 2003 saftey issues was merely tacked onto the end of the programme- if this had any substance wouldn&#8217;t it have been mentioned before in the programme?</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
</channel>
</rss>
