<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?><rss version="2.0"
	xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/"
	xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/"
	xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom"
	xmlns:sy="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/syndication/"
		>
<channel>
	<title>Comments on: Is TV Too Rude? Asking before 9pm was pointless&#8230;</title>
	<atom:link href="http://primetime.unrealitytv.co.uk/is-tv-too-rude-asking-before-9pm-was-pointless/feed/" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml" />
	<link>http://primetime.unrealitytv.co.uk/is-tv-too-rude-asking-before-9pm-was-pointless/</link>
	<description>All The Latest TV Gossip, News, Episode Updates and Spoilers From Your Favourite Soaps, Sitcoms and Primetime Shows.</description>
	<lastBuildDate>Mon, 23 Nov 2009 16:09:34 +0000</lastBuildDate>
	<generator>http://wordpress.org/?v=2.8.5</generator>
	<sy:updatePeriod>hourly</sy:updatePeriod>
	<sy:updateFrequency>1</sy:updateFrequency>
		<item>
		<title>By: Larelle Read</title>
		<link>http://primetime.unrealitytv.co.uk/is-tv-too-rude-asking-before-9pm-was-pointless/comment-page-1/#comment-9329</link>
		<dc:creator>Larelle Read</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Sat, 24 Jan 2009 10:45:58 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://primetime.unrealitytv.co.uk/?p=8963#comment-9329</guid>
		<description>It depends on the context of things whether swearing &quot;has a place&quot; on TV. I thought what the man said about Jamie&#039;s swearing had a certain point to it. Not that it detracts from the topic as such, but the fact that Jamie wasn&#039;t in heated debate or feeling stressed or pressured (as Gordon Ramsay tends to be when he swears), but was just spouting it out willy-nilly. 

Jamie&#039;s series was aimed more at a family audience as well, trying to get families in the kitchen and cooking, so there is a far greater chance that young viewers were watching. I think the language in that case should have been toned down. 

As for the Little Britain USA clip. Walliams and Lucas produce crass comedy. And it *IS* comedy after all, and they were in prosthetics for heaven&#039;s sake!! If you&#039;re going to be offended by that kind of comedy, don&#039;t watch it. 

I have to say the thing I find most obscene about Jonathan Ross (and the only thing really) is his pay packet. 

I&#039;m not against swearing, particularly when it gets used in heated debate (let&#039;s face it, most of us swear when riled), or the odd rude word, but when it&#039;s a tirade like Jamie&#039;s, for no real valid reason other than to seem to appear &quot;cool&quot;, I don&#039;t get it.

I think the watershed should be later, perhaps 9.30pm or 10.00pm. One last thing. Why is it acceptable to hear the word f*ck, but not the word c*nt? It still gets bleeped even after the watershed.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>It depends on the context of things whether swearing &#8220;has a place&#8221; on TV. I thought what the man said about Jamie&#8217;s swearing had a certain point to it. Not that it detracts from the topic as such, but the fact that Jamie wasn&#8217;t in heated debate or feeling stressed or pressured (as Gordon Ramsay tends to be when he swears), but was just spouting it out willy-nilly. </p>
<p>Jamie&#8217;s series was aimed more at a family audience as well, trying to get families in the kitchen and cooking, so there is a far greater chance that young viewers were watching. I think the language in that case should have been toned down. </p>
<p>As for the Little Britain USA clip. Walliams and Lucas produce crass comedy. And it *IS* comedy after all, and they were in prosthetics for heaven&#8217;s sake!! If you&#8217;re going to be offended by that kind of comedy, don&#8217;t watch it. </p>
<p>I have to say the thing I find most obscene about Jonathan Ross (and the only thing really) is his pay packet. </p>
<p>I&#8217;m not against swearing, particularly when it gets used in heated debate (let&#8217;s face it, most of us swear when riled), or the odd rude word, but when it&#8217;s a tirade like Jamie&#8217;s, for no real valid reason other than to seem to appear &#8220;cool&#8221;, I don&#8217;t get it.</p>
<p>I think the watershed should be later, perhaps 9.30pm or 10.00pm. One last thing. Why is it acceptable to hear the word f*ck, but not the word c*nt? It still gets bleeped even after the watershed.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
</channel>
</rss>
