Last Night’s TV – What’s Really In Our Food?

This was a gastronomic horror story, with Tom Heap and Simon Boazman providing the metaphor for a culinary Freddie Kruger and the Candyman as they presented us with horror upon horror in last night’s show. And as it came on, I’d just eaten fish and chips… or had I??
I came away from this programme thinking that nothing’s as it seems in the world of food trading. I thought I was eating cod and spuds, but in actuality, it could’ve been Korean Catfish and stuff injected with water, and all washed in anti-freeze. I kid you not.
Also, I’m not vegetarian and have always felt vaguely guilty about that fact, therefore I avoid veal like the plague and look for meat products which state that the original animals that my pork chops were, at least had a relatively decent life before becoming my dinner. But it seems that cosy notion of self-righteous meat eating was wrong.
Apparently, when the label says ‘Outdoor Bred’, it should more accurately read, ‘We Showed This Pig A Field For About Five Minutes’. What the labelling doesn’t tell you, according to this show, is that Outdoor Bred can equate to animals being outdoors for as little as four weeks, so there goes my guilt-free meat eating… again.
The impact of this show was quite profound for me. For instance, big name labels I’ve trusted – such as M&S – may be big fat liars with their pants firmly on fire, or at best, they’re exaggerating or bending the truth about the food they sell, but I should hastily point out – before any writs are issued – they do so very much within the boundaries of the laws regarding labelling.
M&S in fact got a bit of a battering – no pun about my cod/catfish intended – in this show. And shock horror, if you’ve been blithely buying ‘Lochmuir’ salmon – and we do, to the tune of £300 million per year – and thinking this was an actual place, you would’ve been quite wrong. I imagined a tweed wearing fisherman whiling away heather strewn hours on the banks of Lochmuir, so I was surprised to hear that Lochmuir exists nowhere but in the creative brains of the marketing department.
Other shockers included the fact that bagged salads may have been washed in substances other than just plain old water, which had been my assumption. Again, wrong diddly wrong wrong. They may well have been washed in a cleaning agent laced with anti-freeze!
And when I buy ‘Class A’ eggs, I’d assumed I was buying the best eggs, but actually, Class B eggs cannot legally be sold, so calling them ‘Class A’ rather than ‘The Only Ones We Can Sell You’ is merely a marketing ploy.
And when I buy chicken, I kinda expect to be subsequently eating chicken but in fact, I may be eating the bones and skin of a multitude of animals, not just chicken. And, the original chicken, if indeed there is any in your chicken korma or other takeaway, was probably filled up with water during processing to make it fatter and more appealing.
Finally, the labelling on mince about its fat content just plain can’t be believed; when it says ‘lean mince’ you may in fact be consuming twice the amount of fat it says it contains.
This was a truly informative but stomach churning show. It really is shocking that the food industry as a whole is allowed to con us as it clearly does, so the answer to the show’s title, What’s Really In Our Food, is evidently, Who The Hell Knows, But Probably Hoof, Hide And Chemicals.
If you missed it, you can see it on iPlayer here, and it’s well worth a watch!
Chat about this on the Unreality TV Forum »


It is not surprising to read the review above. The programme makers made it quite clear to insinuate that very little of the food we buy is what it seemes. On that front, well done BBC. Once again, documentary makers go out of their way to sensationalise, to bring to the public the ‘truth’. The impression after watching this was that every food label was designed by agencies and marketeers to ‘con’ the consumer into believing it is something it isn’t and that the authorities can do very little about it. The real truth is that yes there are SOME companies that play in the grey area of food legislation but on the whole most reputable companies employ staff or external consultants, to ensure that the products they are selling do not mislead the consumer even if it is within the law. Few companies want to be challenged by the authorities or have their names up in lights with a negative press.
The lovely pie developed on the show WOULD BE ILLEGAL and any company attempting to put this on the market would risk a severe challenge by the authorities. I’m not saying that it couldn’t go on sale because it could – anyone can put anything on sale but there is the chance that they could be prosecuted.
The real issue with food legislation is with the bureacracy in changing legislation and the lack of government resources to fund policing.
Food legislation is relatively short lived and since its adoption has changed very little however the industry and the consumer demands that have forced these changes have developed rapidly. Generally UK legislation is governed by EU legislation and on the whole, consumer demands in the EU are grossly different to those of the UK.
Trading Standards and Environmental Health are so under resourced that correct enforcement just isn’t possible.
Maybe we, as consumers should stop being ignorant about food; read and try to understand the information that is on the labels, most often it is not difficult; and most importantly stop thinking that we can get something for nothing!! If it is cheaper to buy than what we can make it for then what do you expect!!! Start buying basic ingredients and MAKE IT OURSELVES!!!
ya`know, it just goes to show we haven`t a clue what we are eating.
It may just be better too stay drunk, then none of us will care