<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?><rss version="2.0"
	xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/"
	xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/"
	xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom"
	xmlns:sy="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/syndication/"
		>
<channel>
	<title>Comments on: The Trouble With Working Women – Why Can&#8217;t A Woman Succeed Like A Man</title>
	<atom:link href="http://primetime.unrealitytv.co.uk/the-trouble-with-working-women-%e2%80%93-why-cant-a-woman-succeed-like-a-man/feed/" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml" />
	<link>http://primetime.unrealitytv.co.uk/the-trouble-with-working-women-%e2%80%93-why-cant-a-woman-succeed-like-a-man/</link>
	<description>All The Latest TV Gossip, News, Episode Updates and Spoilers From Your Favourite Soaps, Sitcoms and Primetime Shows.</description>
	<lastBuildDate>Mon, 23 Nov 2009 13:36:21 +0000</lastBuildDate>
	<generator>http://wordpress.org/?v=2.8.5</generator>
	<sy:updatePeriod>hourly</sy:updatePeriod>
	<sy:updateFrequency>1</sy:updateFrequency>
		<item>
		<title>By: Justin</title>
		<link>http://primetime.unrealitytv.co.uk/the-trouble-with-working-women-%e2%80%93-why-cant-a-woman-succeed-like-a-man/comment-page-1/#comment-16922</link>
		<dc:creator>Justin</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Tue, 19 May 2009 17:08:52 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://primetime.unrealitytv.co.uk/?p=13559#comment-16922</guid>
		<description>what an awfully biased program. Take a wimpy male journalist like Rowlatt and show him an office full of strong independent women, and film his BBC friendly stereotypical response of &quot;Ooh, are they all secretaries?&quot;. No, of course not. They&#039;re all strong, independent, go-getting career women/consultants you twonk (with a smug, superior Raworth in attendance). Question: why were there no men in the office then? Perhaps the smug Raworth would like to have implied that they&#039;re clearly inferior, and would have been pushed aside by this crack-team of alpha-females - but that would be to promote the idea that one sex is superior to another, and we can&#039;t have that can we? Usual feminist double-standards.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>what an awfully biased program. Take a wimpy male journalist like Rowlatt and show him an office full of strong independent women, and film his BBC friendly stereotypical response of &#8220;Ooh, are they all secretaries?&#8221;. No, of course not. They&#8217;re all strong, independent, go-getting career women/consultants you twonk (with a smug, superior Raworth in attendance). Question: why were there no men in the office then? Perhaps the smug Raworth would like to have implied that they&#8217;re clearly inferior, and would have been pushed aside by this crack-team of alpha-females &#8211; but that would be to promote the idea that one sex is superior to another, and we can&#8217;t have that can we? Usual feminist double-standards.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
</channel>
</rss>
